Through a program called Intelligence Squared, NPR produces "Oxford style" debates on public issues. On September 24 it broadcast a debate on the premise, "Universal health coverage should be the federal government's responsibility." Both edited and non-edited audio of the debate are found on the linked page. The moderator was John Donvan of ABC News and the debaters included two Canadians with differing views on the suitability of their system as a role model for an American national system.
Audience opinion on the question was polled before and after the debate.
As the web page states, by way of background:
During the past 100 years, medicine has advanced from a rudimentary craft to a scientific pursuit capable of near miracles. Its cost has increased accordingly: In 2006, U.S. health care spending hit $2.1 trillion, or roughly $7,026 for every man, woman and child in the nation.
As a percentage of the gross domestic product, that is substantially more than any other country. Yet a substantial portion of the American population — 47 million that same year — lacked any health insurance, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
As the number of people without insurance increased, so did concern over the problem. But Americans have never neared consensus about what role government in general, and the federal government in particular, should play in ensuring health coverage for all, despite the fact that every other industrialized country has long since established some system of universal insurance.
The stage appears set for yet another major national health insurance debate in 2009, so the Intelligence Squared U.S. series decided to get a head start by choosing it as the topic for its first event of the season. The organization sponsors Oxford-style debates featuring six experts — three on each side — who try to sway an audience that votes before and after the session.